RFR: 8345185: Some tests in test/jdk/tools/jpackage fail with a JDK without JMODs

Mandy Chung mchung at openjdk.org
Tue Dec 10 17:17:38 UTC 2024


On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:57:22 GMT, Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Please review these changes to jpackage in light of [JEP 493](https://openjdk.org/jeps/493). When this feature is enabled, then some of the `jpackage` tests fail. The failures fall into the following categories:
> 
> - `ALL-DEFAULT` notion from `jpackage` which includes all modules that export an API, which includes `jdk.jlink`, which is prevented from being included when linking from the run-time image (see the [JEP 493](https://openjdk.org/jeps/493) restrictions). The proposal is to not include `jdk.jlink` and `jdk.jpackage` by default on a JDK build with JEP 493 enabled. A regular JDK build doesn't have this filtering. We could make this consistent across JDK builds by unconditionally filtering them, but I wasn't sure, so I've opted for the proposed solution for now.
> - Don't issue a warning when there is no `jmods` folder in the JDK install and we have a JEP 493 enabled build. In that case issuing the warning isn't appropriate as it's the expected behaviour.
> - `ALL-MODULE-PATH` changes: `BasicTest.java` verifies the `--add-modules` argument to `jpackage`. Using `ALL-MODULE-PATH` for JDK modules won't be supported for JEP 493-enabled builds. So I've changed this test to skip the test using `ALL-MODULE-PATH` when we have such an enabled build. Other tests, such as `RuntimeImageTest.java` and `RuntimeImageSymbolicLinksTest.java` tests verify something else not related to `ALL-MODULE-PATH` or `--add-modules`. It seems more appropriate to use the smaller set of modules to use for the runtime JDK image.
> - `JLinkOptionsTest.java`: That test verifies options passed to `jlink` via the `ToolProvider` API. For some reason, it uses `--bind-services` extensively and that - in turn - and, when not limited with the `--limit-modules` option as well, will include `jdk.jlink` in the resulting image, again running afoul the JEP 493 restriction of not allowing `jdk.jlink` for now. I propose to use suitable options including `--limit-modules` which would then no longer include `jdk.jlink` in the runtime image and the link from a run-time image works as well. These changes depend on [JDK-8345573](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345573) for it to work fully.
> 
> Testing:
> - [ ] GHA
> - [x] running tests in `test/jdk/tools/jpackage` on a JEP 493 enabled JDK. As far as I could see the failures that I was seeing weren't any more related to JEP 493 (some RPM requirements showing up that it didn't expect to). 
> 
> Thoughts? Opinions?

Can you clarify how `jdk.jpackage` and `jdk.jlink` are included in `ALL-DEFAULT`?   They do not have unqualified exports and hence they are not in the default set of root modules.    They are service providers of `ToolProvider`.  However, JEP 392 https://openjdk.org/jeps/392#Runtime-images specifies that `jpackage` by default does not include `--bind-services`.   

> The default set of jlink options used by jpackage is
> 
> --strip-native-commands --strip-debug --no-man-pages --no-header-files
but this can be changed via the --jlink-options option. The resulting image will not include all available service providers; if you want those to be bound then use --jlink-options and include --bind-services in the list of jlink options.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22644#issuecomment-2532325119


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list