RFR: 8345259: Disallow ALL-MODULE-PATH without explicit --module-path [v10]

Alan Bateman alanb at openjdk.org
Tue Dec 17 11:30:45 UTC 2024


On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 17:23:15 GMT, Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Please review this extension to #22609 which now disallows `ALL-MODULE-PATH` without explicit `--module-path` option or a non-existent module path. In addition, this fixes a bug mentioned in #22609 when `ALL-MODULE-PATH` and `--limit-modules` are used in combination. It failed earlier and passes now due to alignment of `ModuleFinder`s. With this patch JEP 493 enabled builds and regular JDK builds behave the same in terms of `ALL-MODULE-PATH`.
>> 
>> When an explicit module path is being added, there is no difference. All modules on that path will be added as roots. Tests have been added for the various cases and existing tests updated to allow for them to run on JEP 493 enabled builds. Thoughts?
>> 
>> Testing:
>> - [x] GHA, `test/jdk/tools/jlink` (all pass)
>> - [x] Added jlink test.
>
> Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Catch case of module not in dependency tree

Just on --add-modules ALL-MODULE-PATH with --limit-modules. This combination isn't implemented at run-time, I think we just missed it at the time. In practical terms it's not interesting of course but just mentioning it here because I don't think jlink with --add-modules ALL-MODULE-PATH and --limit-modules is interesting either.

The main thing to deal with here is --add-modules ALL-MODULE-PATH without --module-path so I'll focus on that part.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22494#issuecomment-2548207813


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list