RFR: 8316804: Gracefully handle the case where --release is not specified last [v3]

[Jaikiran Pai]

On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 07:44:50 GMT, Christian Stein <cstein at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Please review this change for the `jar` tool to gracefully handle the case where `--release` is not specified as the last arguments.
>> 
>> Prior to this commit, operation modes `-d --describe-module` and `--validate` expected to read the optional `--release` option as a file argument: `jar -d -f a.jar --release 9`
>> By adding a hidden GNU-style `--release` option, processing the optional arguments before in those two operation modes, the position is now no longer required to trail behind the `-f --file` option: `jar -d --release 9 -f a.jar`
>> 
>> 
>> ==============================
>> Test summary
>> ==============================
>>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR
>>    jtreg:test/jdk/tools/jar                             26    26     0     0
>> ==============================
>> TEST SUCCESS
>
> Christian Stein has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Add two more valid use-cases

src/jdk.jartool/share/classes/sun/tools/jar/GNUStyleOptions.java line 347:

> 345:                 break;
> 346:             if (name.equals("--release")) {
> 347:                 // JDK-8316804: stay here when in `--describe-module`

It's my understanding that we don't include the bug ids in the code comments within the JDK. The rest of the comment without the bug id I think would be sufficient.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22079#discussion_r1890449994