RFR: 8346532: XXXVector::rearrangeTemplate misses null check
Quan Anh Mai
qamai at openjdk.org
Wed Dec 18 18:37:39 UTC 2024
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 17:51:08 GMT, Paul Sandoz <psandoz at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Looks good, thanks for fixing.
>>
>> This is really a bug rather than an enhancement. In the package JavaDoc we state:
>>> * For every class in this package,
>>> * unless specified otherwise, any method arguments of reference
>>> * type must not be null, and any null argument will elicit a
>>> * {@code NullPointerException}. This fact is not individually
>>> * documented for methods of this API.
>>
>> We should also backport to 24. From the main issue create a backport issue (from the `More` drop down menu). Then from the main PR type `/backport :jdk24`, that will create a PR for the `jdk24` branch from which i can review and then you can integrate.
>
>> @PaulSandoz Not really, nullable argument will inhibit intrinsification, and the fall back implementation will throw `NullPointerException`. So the only thing we miss here is the intrinsification of `VectorSupport::rearrange`.
>
> Ah, yes of course. Still i would categorize as a bug.
@PaulSandoz Thanks for the reviews, given the change is fairly trivial, I will merge it now.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22816#issuecomment-2552008086
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list