RFR: 8325304: Several classes in java.util.jar and java.util.zip don't specify the behaviour for null arguments [v2]
Lance Andersen
lancea at openjdk.org
Tue Feb 6 11:27:54 UTC 2024
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 10:31:06 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <jpai at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this doc-only change which updates the javadoc of several classes in `java.util.jar` and `java.util.zip` to specify their behaviour when `null` arguments are passed to the constructor or methods of those classes?
>>
>> For these updated classes, I have individually checked that they indeed throw a `NullPointerException` when `null` is passed to their constructor or methods. The couple of places where `null` is accepted have been updated to mention that `null` is allowed.
>
> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> include CheckedInputStream and CheckedOutputStream
Hi Jai,
Thank you for tackling this. An initial comment on a quick read
I noticed you use "can cause" here and later use "will cause". I think we should try to be consistent.
Perhaps we should use "will result in a..."
-------------
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17728#pullrequestreview-1864907969
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list