RFR: 8322846: Running with -Djdk.tracePinnedThreads set can hang

Jaikiran Pai jpai at openjdk.org
Wed Jan 3 09:50:47 UTC 2024


On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 13:53:39 GMT, Alan Bateman <alanb at openjdk.org> wrote:

> -Djdk.tracePinnedThreads is a debugging option that dates from early development in the loom repo to identify pinned threads. It has several issues and this tracing option will eventually be removed (use the JFR events instead). Several hangs have been reported when running with the system property set. The "hangs" stem from the onPinned callback executing while the virtual thread is in a transition state (typically parking). If the virtual parks while printing the stack trace then it works like a nested park where the thread state is never restored. Contention on the System.out can also lead to deadlock when there are platform and pinned virtual threads printing to System.out around the same time.
> 
> This PR brings over the changes from the loom repo to avoid these hangs. The changes mean the stack trace is only printed to System.out when the PrintStream lock can be acquired without blocking. It also restores the thread state after printing. An alternative to not printing traces would of course be to queue the traces so they are printed by another thread but this is just adding complexity for a debugging option that we want to go away.

test/jdk/java/lang/Thread/virtual/TracePinnedThreads.java line 105:

> 103:      */
> 104:     @Test
> 105:     void testContention() throws Exception {

I think this test method  expects to have all the launched threads to print to System.out without hanging. If it hangs then we expect the test run to timeout with a jtreg timeout. Given the context of this PR in which this test method is being introduced, I think I can understand what it does. But maybe we should update the test method's comment to say that this method verifies that contention when writing to System.out when pinned doesn't cause any hangs?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17221#discussion_r1440252673


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list