RFR: JDK-8320448 Accelerate IndexOf using AVX2 [v7]
Jatin Bhateja
jbhateja at openjdk.org
Tue Jan 16 10:26:28 UTC 2024
On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 23:06:32 GMT, Scott Gibbons <sgibbons at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Re-write the IndexOf code without the use of the pcmpestri instruction, only using AVX2 instructions. This change accelerates String.IndexOf on average 1.3x for AVX2. The benchmark numbers:
>>
>>
>> Benchmark Score Latest
>> StringIndexOf.advancedWithMediumSub 343.573 317.934 0.925375393x
>> StringIndexOf.advancedWithShortSub1 1039.081 1053.96 1.014319384x
>> StringIndexOf.advancedWithShortSub2 55.828 110.541 1.980027943x
>> StringIndexOf.constantPattern 9.361 11.906 1.271872663x
>> StringIndexOf.searchCharLongSuccess 4.216 4.218 1.000474383x
>> StringIndexOf.searchCharMediumSuccess 3.133 3.216 1.02649218x
>> StringIndexOf.searchCharShortSuccess 3.76 3.761 1.000265957x
>> StringIndexOf.success 9.186 9.713 1.057369911x
>> StringIndexOf.successBig 14.341 46.343 3.231504079x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_AVX2_String 6220.918 12154.52 1.953814533x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_AVX2_char 5503.556 5540.044 1.006629895x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_SSE4_String 6978.854 6818.689 0.977049957x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_SSE4_char 5657.499 5474.624 0.967675646x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_Short_String 7132.541 6863.359 0.962260014x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_Short_char 16013.389 16162.437 1.009307711x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_mixed_String 7386.123 14771.622 1.999915517x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_mixed_char 9901.671 9782.245 0.987938803
>
> Scott Gibbons has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 22 commits:
>
> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into indexof
> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into indexof
> - Addressing review comments.
> - Fix for JDK-8321599
> - Support UU IndexOf
> - Only use optimization when EnableX86ECoreOpts is true
> - Fix whitespace
> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into indexof
> - Comments; added exhaustive-ish test
> - Subtracting 0x10 twice.
> - ... and 12 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/8e12053e...3e58d0c2
src/hotspot/share/opto/library_call.cpp line 1228:
> 1226: result = _gvn.transform(new ProjNode(call, TypeFunc::Parms));
> 1227: } else {
> 1228: result = make_indexOf_node(src_start, src_count, tgt_start, tgt_count,
Existing routines emits IR to handle following special cases.
tgt_cnt > src_cnt return -1
tgt_cnt == 0 return 0.
Should we not be preserving those check before calling stub ?
As of now these checks are part of stub and doing them in JIT code will save call overhead.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16753#discussion_r1453223658
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list