RFR: 8328821: Map.of().entrySet() mutators should throw UnsupportedOperationException [v3]
Chen Liang
liach at openjdk.org
Mon Jul 8 20:42:36 UTC 2024
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 17:42:23 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon <cushon at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This change overrides mutator methods in the implementation returned by `Map.of().entrySet()` to throw `UnsupportedOperationException`.
>
> Liam Miller-Cushon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains six additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into JDK-8328821-make-clear-consistent
> - Check m.entrySet().hashCode() in MOAT
> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into JDK-8328821-make-clear-consistent
> - Use AbstractImmutableSet
> - Throw UOE for all Map.of().entrySet() mutator methods
> - 8328821: Make the ImmutableCollections clear() call consistent
>
> Without overriding clear(), a call to it in an empty map would
> just return, as iterator.hasNext() would be false. However if
> calling Map.of().clear() throws an exception. To make the
> behavior of Map.of().entrySet().clear() consistent, we need to
> have an implementation of clear() for the entry set that throws
> as well.
test/jdk/java/util/Map/MapFactories.java line 505:
> 503:
> 504: @Test(expectedExceptions=UnsupportedOperationException.class)
> 505: public void immutableEntrySetAddAllDisallowed() {
Looking back at MOAT, do you think we should add these into MOAT?
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/598af2e51464be089b64da4024e62865c2c6ec72/test/jdk/java/util/Collection/MOAT.java#L594-L619
We just need to add calls to `testMapMutatorsAlwaysThrow` and `testEmptyMapMutatorsAlwaysThrow` to check
`test(Empty)CollMutatorsAlwaysThrow(map.entrySet());`, `test(Empty)CollMutatorsAlwaysThrow(map.keySet());`, and `test(Empty)CollMutatorsAlwaysThrow(map.values());`
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18522#discussion_r1669279616
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list