RFR: 8333793: Improve BootstrapMethodInvoker for ConstantBootstraps and ProxyGenerator [v2]

Claes Redestad redestad at openjdk.org
Mon Jun 10 10:09:38 UTC 2024


On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 18:58:36 GMT, Claes Redestad <redestad at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This PR refactors type matching in BootstrapMethodInvoker and adds a few types, seeking to improve bootstrap overheads of some ConstantBootstraps and in particular the ProxyGenerator condys generated for e.g. annotation proxies since [JDK-8332457](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8332457)
>> 
>> I've adjusted the micro-benchmark added by JDK-8332457 to not only generate a proxy but also call into one of the proxied methodt (`Object::hashCode`). 
>> 
>> Running org.openjdk.bench.java.lang.reflect.ProxyGenBench as a one-off startup benchmark sees significant improvement (-9% instructions, -6% cycles):
>> 
>> Name             Cnt           Base          Error            Test          Error         Unit  Change
>> Perfstartup-JMH   20        154,000 ±        8,165         148,000 ±       23,164        ms/op   1,04x (p = 0,352 )
>>   :.cycles            925335973,200 ± 47147600,262   842221278,800 ± 46836254,964       cycles   0,91x (p = 0,000*)
>>   :.instructions     2101588857,600 ± 81105850,361  1966307798,400 ± 22011043,908 instructions   0,94x (p = 0,000*)
>>   :.taskclock               291,500 ±       16,494         262,000 ±       15,328           ms   0,90x (p = 0,000*)
>>   * = significant
>> 
>> Number of classes loaded drops from 1096 to 1092
>> 
>> Running the micro regularly shows no significant difference:
>> 
>> Name                              Cnt   Base   Error    Test   Error  Unit  Change
>> ProxyGenBench.generateAndProxy100  10 26,827 ± 8,954  26,855 ± 7,531 ms/op   1,00x (p = 0,991 )
>>   * = significant
>
> Claes Redestad has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Adress review comments, add ConstantBootstraps#invoke to list of recognized type signatures

Thanks, I'll see if I can get that working and if it has any effect as a follow-up. 

Testing caught a bug introduced by a copy-paste error in 532966a, re-running a few more tests now.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19598#issuecomment-2157922124


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list