RFR: 8322420: [Linux] cgroup v2: Limits in parent nested control groups are not detected [v8]

Jan Kratochvil jkratochvil at openjdk.org
Tue May 7 09:39:05 UTC 2024


On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 14:40:09 GMT, Jan Kratochvil <jkratochvil at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The testcase requires root permissions.
>> 
>> Designed by  Severin Gehwolf, implemented by Jan Kratochvil.
>
> Jan Kratochvil has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 35 commits:
> 
>  - Fix whitespace
>  - Merge branch 'master' into master-cgroup
>    
>    Conflicts:
>    	test/hotspot/gtest/os/linux/test_cgroupSubsystem_linux.cpp
>  - Fix gtest
>  - Update the Java part
>  - Fix cgroup1 backward compatibility message
>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'centos79/master-cgroup' into master-cgroup
>  - Disable cgroup.subtree_control testcase on cgroup1
>  - Fix gtest
>  - Merge branch 'master' into master-cgroup
>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'f38crac/master-cgroup' into master-cgroup
>  - ... and 25 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/243cb098...39c90162

Should JDK still support `memory.use_hierarchy == 0`? That has been already removed from Linux kernel: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/bef8620cd8e0a117c1a0719604052e424eb418f9
This patch is apparently present even in kernel-3.10.0-1160.118.1.el7.x86_64 (CentOS-7.9 updates)
It is not present in kernel-3.10.0-1160.el7.x86_64 (CentOS-7.9 release)
Still CentOS-7 is almost EOLed, is there any other distro for cgroup1?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17198#issuecomment-2097873090


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list