RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode
Doug Lea
dl at openjdk.org
Fri May 10 12:08:17 UTC 2024
On Fri, 10 May 2024 08:15:59 GMT, Viktor Klang <vklang at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This set of changes address causes of poor utilization with small numbers of cores due to overly aggressive contention avoidance. A number of further adjustments were needed to still avoid most contention effects in deployments with large numbers of cores
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.java line 1883:
>
>> 1881: if (qs == null)
>> 1882: break;
>> 1883: if (qs.length <= i)
>
> @DougLea Any particular reason why these are not or-branches of a single if?
An old trick to save bytecode branches, reducing code size. I haven't checked lately whether this is still true though.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19131#discussion_r1596670378
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list