RFR: 8331724: Refactor j.l.constant implementation to internal package [v9]
Chen Liang
liach at openjdk.org
Tue May 14 20:24:04 UTC 2024
On Tue, 14 May 2024 17:25:37 GMT, Claes Redestad <redestad at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This PR suggests refactoring the implementation classes of java.lang.constant into a new package jdk.internal.constant to enable sharing some trusted static factory methods with users elsewhere in java.base, such as java.lang.invoke and java.lang.classfile. The refactoring also adds some "trusted" methods for use when input is pre-validated, and makes use of them where applicable in the current implementation. There are more changes in the pipeline which will be folded into #17108 or PR'ed once that is integrated.
>>
>> There are two optimizations mixed up here. One in `MethodTypeDesc.ofDescriptor`:
>>
>> Name (descString) Cnt Base Error Test Error Unit Change
>> MethodTypeDescFactories.ofDescriptor (Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/String;)I 6 138,371 ± 0,767 136,939 ± 1,126 ns/op 1,01x (p = 0,000*)
>> MethodTypeDescFactories.ofDescriptor ()V 6 10,528 ± 2,495 4,110 ± 0,047 ns/op 2,56x (p = 0,000*)
>> MethodTypeDescFactories.ofDescriptor ([IJLjava/lang/String;Z)Ljava/util/List; 6 209,390 ± 4,583 196,175 ± 3,211 ns/op 1,07x (p = 0,000*)
>> MethodTypeDescFactories.ofDescriptor ()[Ljava/lang/String; 6 36,039 ± 8,684 20,794 ± 1,110 ns/op 1,73x (p = 0,000*)
>> MethodTypeDescFactories.ofDescriptor (..IIJ)V 6 279,139 ± 6,248 187,934 ± 0,857 ns/op 1,49x (p = 0,000*)
>> MethodTypeDescFactories.ofDescriptor (.....................). 6 2174,387 ± 132,879 1150,652 ± 3,158 ns/op 1,89x (p = 0,000*)
>> * = significant
>>
>>
>> The other in `ClassDesc::nested`, where to get rid of a simple static method in `ConstantUtils` I ended up speeding up and simplifying the public factory method:
>>
>> Name Cnt Base Error Test Error Unit Change
>> ClassDescFactories.ReferenceOnly.ofNested 6 209,853 ± 132,525 22,017 ± 0,573 ns/op 9,53x (p = 0,000*)
>> * = significant
>>
>>
>> The optimizations could be split out and PRd independently, but I think they are simple enough to include in this refactoring.
>
> Claes Redestad has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Add microbenchmark for ClassDesc methods + a few optimizations
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/constant/ClassDesc.java line 226:
> 224: for (int i = 0; i < rank; i++) {
> 225: sb.append('[');
> 226: }
Would `sb.repeat("[", rank);` be better here?
Also for parity with `arrayType()` I recommend moving this building code to after the void check.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19105#discussion_r1600598008
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list