RFR: 8338383: Implement JEP 491: Synchronize Virtual Threads without Pinning
Andrew Haley
aph at openjdk.org
Wed Nov 6 17:40:01 UTC 2024
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 15:48:43 GMT, Andrew Haley <aph at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/c2_MacroAssembler_aarch64.cpp line 60:
>>
>>> 58:
>>> 59: assert(LockingMode != LM_LIGHTWEIGHT, "lightweight locking should use fast_lock_lightweight");
>>> 60: assert_different_registers(oop, box, tmp, disp_hdr, rscratch2);
>>
>> Historically, silently using `rscratch1` and `rscratch2` in these macros has sometimes turned out to be a mistake.
>> Please consider making `rscratch2` an additional argument to `fast_lock`, so that it's explicit in the caller. It won't make any difference to the generated code, but it might help readbility.
>
> Note also that `inc_held_monitor_count` clobbers `rscratch2`. That might be worth a comment at the call site.
> I guess `inc_held_monitor_count` is so hot that we can't push and pop scratch registers, in which case it'd clobber nothing.
> Historically, silently using `rscratch1` and `rscratch2` in these macros has sometimes turned out to be a mistake. Please consider making `rscratch2` an additional argument to `fast_lock`, so that it's explicit in the caller. It won't make any difference to the generated code, but it might help readbility.
Hmm, forget that. It's rather tricky code, that's true, but I think we're OK.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21565#discussion_r1810998545
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list