RFR: 8337217: Port VirtualMemoryTracker to use VMATree

[Johan Sjölen]

On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 16:10:59 GMT, Gerard Ziemski <gziemski at openjdk.org> wrote:

> > > Rather than having 2 implementations, I'd like to see us aiming for integration for JDK-25 after forking 24, so integration in December. That would give us 6 months of ensuring stability of the new implementation before it reaches any customers. During those 6 months it will go through all of our testing multiple times over, and be used by OpenJDK developers. What do you think of this idea?
> > 
> > 
> > No objection. We can do this way.
> 
> Thank you Afshin for agreeing and thank you Johan for clearly stating the arguments.
> 
> I was trying to think of a precedent where we shipped JDK with 2 small implementation details that were exposed via runtime flags, but nothing comes to mind...

Yes, thank you Afshin for reconsidering. I do sympathise with the goal of ensuring that no user receives a faulty build.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20425#issuecomment-2379664905