RFR: 8337217: Port VirtualMemoryTracker to use VMATree

[Afshin Zafari]

On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 16:23:29 GMT, Gerard Ziemski <gziemski at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Should we say then, that this is blocked by those 2 issues? Is it OK then if I wait till those get checked in before verifying the performance benefits if the new implementation? The performance was the main motivation here, correct?

It is not blocked, but until those 2 other PRs we cannot expect the full speed of the new VMT. There are some functions that are not efficient without those 2 PRs.
You can test VMT with your microbenchmarks but if it fails in competition give it another chance after those PRs.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20425#issuecomment-2379801032