RFR: 8331977: Crash: SIGSEGV in dlerror()
Thomas Stuefe
stuefe at openjdk.org
Sat Nov 9 23:02:42 UTC 2024
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 13:02:18 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk <asemenyuk at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Fix MainClassTest class to use HelloApp.AppOutputVerifier class to run app launcher instead of raw Executor. This makes MainClassTest test run app launchers with retries. This change addresses the primary issue.
>>
>> Fix inconsistencies in HelloApp.AppOutputVerifier class. It used to provide API allowing to run launchers without retries. It inconsistently allowed the execution of launchers with suppressed output (stdout and stderr). It inconsistently executed launchers with/without PATH removed from the environment.
>>
>> These loopholes were eliminated:
>>
>> - stdout and stderr of app launchers is never suppressed;
>> - PATH env variable is always deleted for app launchers on Windows. It is not deleted on other platforms. This change sets the correct scope of [JDK-8254920](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8254920) fix that introduced the removal of PATH env variable for app launchers;
>> - app launchers are always executed with retries unless the launcher is executed with `jpackage.test.noexit` system property set to `true` indicating the test app will not terminate on its own.
>>
>> Other changes are due to changes in HelloApp.AppOutputVerifier class.
>
> The crash is sporadic, hard to reproduce, and happens only on Linux.
> Almost every jpackage test runs a launcher, so the alternative to "hiding" the issue was to disable all jpackage tests or make them not run launchers on Linux. There is no good solution except nailing and fixing the root cause.
@alexeysemenyukoracle Would have been good to rename this JBS issue then to something like "rerun tests in case of crashes", since the issue, from the outside, looks like a fix for the crash itself.
This is mostly to make our lives easier when it comes to backporting (which may happen years from now, when everyone forgot what this was)
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19502#issuecomment-2147486733
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list