RFR: 8340133: Add concise usage message to the java executable [v8]
Kevin Bourrillion
duke at openjdk.org
Tue Nov 12 19:50:39 UTC 2024
On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 13:17:13 GMT, Jan Lahoda <jlahoda at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Currently, running `java` without any parameters will lead to an output that is a full `--help`, which is over 100 lines (on my computer at least), and it feels overwhelming. And many people might actually want to run JShell/REPL, not the `java` executable, but it is difficult find out about JShell.
>>
>> The proposal herein is to print a much shorter help, together with a pointer to JShell, when the executable does not know what to do. I.e. there is nothing specified to start, and no option like `--help` is specified. In particular, on my machine, it prints:
>>
>> openjdk 24-internal 2025-03-18
>>
>> Usage: java [java options...] <application> [application arguments...]
>>
>> Where <application> is one of:
>> <mainclass> to execute the main method of a compiled class
>> -jar <jarfile>.jar to execute the main class of a JAR archive
>> -m <module>[/<mainclass>] to execute the main class of a module
>> <sourcefile>.java to compile and execute a source-file program
>>
>> Where key java options include:
>> --class-path <class path>
>> where <class path> is a list of directories and JAR archives to search for class files, separated by ":"
>> --module-path <module path>
>> where <module path> is a list of directories and JAR archives to search for modules, separated by ":"
>>
>> For additional help on usage: java --help
>> For an interactive Java environment: jshell
>>
>>
>> Hopefully, this may be easier both for people trying to run something, and for people that are really looking for JShell.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> Jan Lahoda has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Reflecting review feedback:
> - using "conciseVersionString" intead of "shortVersionString"
> - using <jarfile>.jar <jarfile>
Ohh, I think I was answering a question that was never asked then. You were just talking about which _form_ of the version string to use.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21411#issuecomment-2471427873
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list