RFR: 8344289: SM cleanup in jdk.internal.util [v2]
Sean Mullan
mullan at openjdk.org
Fri Nov 15 20:59:55 UTC 2024
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 20:34:31 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs <eirbjo at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Either way is fine. I think we probably need to review the majority of uses of VM.savedPropoerty as they mostly relate to SM boot circularity. So we will change this one either now or later.
>
> I would prefer if we could deal with getSavedProperty as a wider area follow up, since that would creep out of scope for this particular PR.
>
> Ok with you, @liach ?
>
> Perhaps @seanjmullan has input on how to deal with VM.getSavedProperty across the code base?
I prefer to minimize code changes for these cleanup issues. We should file a separate issue, "Examine usages of VM.getSavedProperty after JEP 486" or something like that.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22141#discussion_r1844480355
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list