RFR: 8342469: Improve API documentation for java.lang.classfile.instruction [v4]
Adam Sotona
asotona at openjdk.org
Thu Nov 21 10:59:23 UTC 2024
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 23:03:43 GMT, Chen Liang <liach at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Improve the documentation for classfile instructions. Includes links to all opcodes, usage notes for instructions, and other various fixes.
>>
>> API Diff: https://cr.openjdk.org/~liach/apidiff/cf-instr/java.base/module-summary.html
>> Javadoc: https://cr.openjdk.org/~liach/javadoc/cf-instr/java.base/java/lang/classfile/instruction/package-summary.html
>>
>> Please review the associated CSR as well.
>
> Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with four additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - typo
> - More cleanup
> - Remove a few confusions around bad modeling, some missing exceptions, also the labelless info models
> - Non-int constant values
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/classfile/instruction/ConvertInstruction.java line 44:
> 42: * Delivered as a {@link CodeElement} when traversing the elements of a {@link CodeModel}.
> 43: * <p>
> 44: * Conceptually, a primitive conversion instruction is a record:
Here remains "Conceptually, ... is a record"
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/classfile/instruction/DiscontinuedInstruction.java line 69:
> 67: * instruction model is written by a {@link CodeBuilder}.
> 68: * <p>
> 69: * Jump subroutine instructions push a {@link TypeKind##returnAddress
I don't think we have a TypeKind##returnAddress.
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/classfile/instruction/DiscontinuedInstruction.java line 130:
> 128: * <p>
> 129: * {@link StoreInstruction astore} series of instructions store a {@link
> 130: * TypeKind##returnAddress returnAddress} value to a local variable slot,
And the same here.
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/classfile/instruction/InvokeInstruction.java line 51:
> 49: * Delivered as a {@link CodeElement} when traversing the elements of a {@link CodeModel}.
> 50: * <p>
> 51: * Conceptually, a method invocation instruction is a record:
And here
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21625#discussion_r1851832104
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21625#discussion_r1851829395
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21625#discussion_r1851829969
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21625#discussion_r1851835367
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list