RFR: 8340133: Investigate if the java launcher could give hints about JShell

Goetz Lindenmaier goetz at openjdk.org
Wed Oct 9 12:34:57 UTC 2024


On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:28:17 GMT, Jan Lahoda <jlahoda at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Currently, running `java` without any parameters will lead to an output that is a full `--help`, which is over 100 lines (on my computer at least), and it feels overwhelming. And many people might actually want to run JShell/REPL, not the `java` launcher, but it is difficult find out about JShell.
> 
> The proposal herein is to print a much shorter help, together with a pointer to JShell, when the launcher does not know what to do. I.e. there is nothing specified to start, and no option like `--help` is specified. In particular, on my machine, it prints:
> 
> $ java
> openjdk 24-internal 2025-03-18
> 
> Usage: java [options...] <what to execute> [arguments to main method...]
> 
> Where <what to execute> is one of:
>   <MainClass>                to execute the main method of a compiled class
>   -jar <jar-file.jar>        to execute the main class in a JAR archive
>   -m <module>[/<MainClass>]  to execute the main class of a module
>   <SourceFile.java>          to compile and execute a single-file program
> 
> Where key options include:
>   --class-path <class path>
>       a : separated list of directories and JAR archives to search for class files
>   --module-path <module path>
>       a : separated list of directories and JAR archives to search for modules
> 
> For more details about this launcher:   java --help
> For an interactive Java environment:    jshell
> 
> 
> Hopefully, this may be easier both for people trying to run something, and for people that are really looking for JShell.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Thanks!

Hi,
I think this information can be very helpful for people that are not used to Java. 
But I doubt that such people know about the launcher architecture, i.e. that there are several launcher programs that load the libjvm.  So I would avoid the term "launcher" in the documentation and maybe replace it by "program" or "java virtual machine".
Just my 5 cents...

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21411#issuecomment-2402195817


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list