Would it make sense to add a new constructor to java.io.SequenceInputStream?

[David Alayachew]

Hello Jaikiran,

Thanks for the response. This is exactly what I was looking for.

Does this mean that this is up for grabs? There was a comment near the
bottom about more evaluations, but that was also in 2023.

If all I need to do is continue the work that the other person was doing, I
am more than happy to.

Looks like in the pr attempted but closed, all Aleksey Shipilëv wanted was
for the developer to activate the test suite, so that they could see that
the tests passed. It sounds like all I need to do is do that and then we
should be good for review?

On Thu, Oct 17, 2024, 12:54 AM Jaikiran Pai <jai.forums2013 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello David,
>
> There's an enhancement request for this here
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8305947
>
> -Jaikiran
>
> On 17/10/24 9:17 am, David Alayachew wrote:
> > Hello Core Libs Dev Team,
> >
> > Currently, java.io.SequenceInputStream only has 2 constructors -- one
> > that takes in 2 instances of InputStream, and another that takes in an
> > Enumeration of type InputStream.
> >
> > Would it make sense to add a third constructor that takes in multiple
> > instances of InputStream? I don't know if a list, an array, varargs,
> > etc makes more sense. But I would think a 3rd constructor would
> > improve this API.
> >
> > Thank you for your time and help.
> > David Alayachew
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/attachments/20241017/6e768f43/attachment.htm>