RFR: 8338017: Add AOT command-line flag aliases [v7]
Ioi Lam
iklam at openjdk.org
Tue Oct 22 16:42:41 UTC 2024
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 05:33:55 GMT, Ioi Lam <iklam at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This is the 1st PR for [JEP 483: Ahead-of-Time Class Loading & Linking](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8315737).
>>
>> Add the following command-line options as specified in JEP 483:
>>
>>
>> - `-XX:AOTMode=off/record/create/auto/on`
>> - `-XX:AOTConfiguration=<file>.aotconfig`
>> - `-XX:AOTCache=<file>.aot`
>>
>> These options are implemented as aliases to existing command-line flags such as `-Xshare:dump`, `-XX:SharedArchiveFile`, `-XX:DumpLoadedClassesList`, etc.
>>
>> Please see the CSR (TODO) for detailed specification.
>>
>> -----
>> See [here](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8315737) for the sequence of dependent RFEs for implementing JEP 483.
>
> Ioi Lam has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 11 additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - Merge branch 'master' into jep-483-step-01-8338017-add-aot-command-line-aliases
> - Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk into jep-483-step-01-8338017-add-aot-command-line-aliases
> - Merge branch 'master' into jep-483-step-01-8338017-add-aot-command-line-aliases
> - @macarte comments
> - Merge branch 'master' into jep-483-step-01-8338017-add-aot-command-line-aliases
> - @dholmes-ora comments: do not check for -XX:AOTMode=create in JLI java.c
> - Fixed copyright dates
> - Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk into jep-483-step-01-8338017-add-aot-command-line-aliases
> - Merge branch 'master' into jep-483-step-01-8338017-add-aot-command-line-aliases
> - Fixed whitespaces
> - ... and 1 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/886cf507...d02959b8
Closing this PR as its changes have been combined into https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21642.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20516#issuecomment-2429737737
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list