RFR: 8342902: Deduplication of acquire calls in BindingSpecializer causes escape-analyisis failure [v2]
Jorn Vernee
jvernee at openjdk.org
Fri Oct 25 18:07:06 UTC 2024
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:47:42 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore <mcimadamore at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This PR fixes an issue where passing many by-reference parameters to downcall results in escape analysis failures.
>> The problem is that, as the parameters grow, the generated code in the trampoline stub we generate also grows.
>> When it reaches a certain threshold, it becomes too big, and it is no longer inlined in the caller.
>> When this happens, allocations for by-reference parameters (e.g. a segment constructed from `MemorySegment::ofAddress`) can no longer be eliminated.
>>
>> The solution is two-fold. First, we annotate the generated trampoline with `@ForceInline`. After all, it is rather critical, to guarantee optimal performance, that this code can be always inlined.
>> Second, to keep the size of the generated code under control, we also put a limit on the max number of comparisons that are generated in order to "deduplicate" scope acquire/release calls.
>> The deduplication logic is a bit finicky -- it was put in place because, when confined and shared are passed by-ref, we need to prevent them from being closed in the middle of a native call.
>> So, we save all the seen scopes in a bunch of locals, and then we compare each new scope with _all_ the previous cached locals, and skip acquire if we can.
>>
>> While this strategy work it does not scale when there are many by-ref parameters - as a by-ref parameter N will need N - 1 comparisons - which means a quadratic number of comparisons is generated.
>> This is fixed in this PR by putting a lid on the maximum number of comparisons that are generated. We also make the comparisons a bit smarter, by always skipping the very first by-ref argument -- the downcall address.
>> It is in fact very common for the downcall address to be in a different scope than that of the other by-ref arguments anyway.
>>
>> A nice property of the new logic is that by configuring the max number of comparisons we can effectively select between different strategies:
>> * max = 0, means no dedup
>> * max = 1, means one-element cache
>> * max = N, means full dedup (like before)
>>
>> Thanks to Ioannis (@spasi) for the report and the benchmark. I've beefed the benchmark up by adding a case for 10 arguments, and also adding support for critical downcalls, so we could also test passing by-ref heap segments. Benchmark result will be provided in a separate comment.
>
> Maurizio Cimadamore has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Fix issue with native benchmark lib
Marked as reviewed by jvernee (Reviewer).
-------------
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21706#pullrequestreview-2396072745
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list