RFR: 8325949: Create an internal utility method for creating VarHandle instances [v4]

[Chen Liang]

On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 13:05:24 GMT, Per Minborg <pminborg at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This PR suggests introducing an internal class in `java.base` to simplify the use of some `MethodHandles.Lookup` operations.
>> 
>> While the utility of the methods might appear to be limited in classes with many static `VarHandle`/`MethodHandle` variables, it should be noted that the class files become smaller and simpler. Here are some examples:
>> 
>> | Class File                                      | Base [Bytes] | Patch [Byte] |
>> | --------------------------------| ------------- | ------------ |
>> | FutureTask.class                          |            10,255 |          10,123 |
>> | AtomicBoolean.class                   |             5,364 |            5,134 |
>> |AtomicMarkableReference.class |             3,890 |           3,660 |
>> 
>> ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fdcbbdfe-c906-4e50-a48c-4944c53c08cc)
>> 
>> The new `MethodHandlesInternal.class` file is of size 1,952 bytes.
>> 
>> In total for `java.base` we have:
>> 
>> | Build map "jdk"  | Size [Bytes] |
>> | ---------------| ------------- |
>> | Base                 |     5,906,457 |
>> | Patch                |     5,905,487 |
>> | Delta                 |                940|
>> 
>> For 60 billion instances, this represents > 50 TB.
>> 
>> Tried and passed tier1-3
>
> Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Update javadoc
>  - Rename utility class

I think a better approach to this problem might be converting these static final MethodHandle/VarHandle to class-file constants (Constant_MethodHandle for MH, Constant_Dynamic for VH), see JEP 303.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20972#issuecomment-2355833854