RFR: 8325949: Create an internal utility method for creating VarHandle instances [v7]
Roger Riggs
rriggs at openjdk.org
Fri Sep 20 16:14:38 UTC 2024
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:14:04 GMT, Per Minborg <pminborg at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This PR suggests introducing an internal class in `java.base` to simplify the use of some `MethodHandles.Lookup` operations.
>>
>> While the utility of the methods might appear to be limited in classes with many static `VarHandle`/`MethodHandle` variables, it should be noted that the class files become smaller and simpler. Here are some examples:
>>
>> | Class File | Base [Bytes] | Patch [Byte] |
>> | --------------------------------| ------------- | ------------ |
>> | FutureTask.class | 10,255 | 10,123 |
>> | AtomicBoolean.class | 5,364 | 5,134 |
>> |AtomicMarkableReference.class | 3,890 | 3,660 |
>>
>> 
>>
>> The new `MethodHandlesInternal.class` file is of size 1,952 bytes.
>>
>> In total for `java.base` we have:
>>
>> | Build map "jdk" | Size [Bytes] |
>> | ---------------| ------------- |
>> | Base | 5,906,457 |
>> | Patch | 5,905,487 |
>> | Delta | 940|
>>
>> For 60 billion instances, this represents > 50 TB.
>>
>> Tried and passed tier1-3
>
> Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Revert change
Looks good.
The current (MhUtil) source is easier to read.
So unless ConstantBootstraps could have an equivalent (simple) API that evaluates to a DynamicConstant, keep what you have.
-------------
Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20972#pullrequestreview-2318714294
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20972#issuecomment-2364070043
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list