RFR: 8321413: IllegalArgumentException: Code length outside the allowed range while creating a jlink image

Henry Jen henryjen at openjdk.org
Thu Sep 26 01:34:35 UTC 2024


On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 23:49:18 GMT, Chen Liang <liach at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This PR split out large array/set construction into separate factory methods to avoid oversized method trying to construct several of those.
>> 
>> In order to do that, we will need to generate those help methods on demand in the class builder. Here we have two approach, one is for dedup set, which is processed in advance so we can know what methods should be created.
>> 
>> Another is for random set, such as packages, thus we put those request into a queue to amend the class later.
>> 
>> To keep the optimization of caching built value that are references more than once, it was implemented using local vars, which doesn't work well for helper methods. The existing approach to populate local vars doesn't work well with larger scope of split operation, as the slot was allocated on lazily built, but the transfer is captured in advance, this count could mismatch as built time and run time.
>> 
>> So we make this build in advance, and use a static array for values referred more than once.
>> 
>> All the codegen instead of giving index to be loaded, the builder snippet now load the wanted set/array to the operand stack to be consistent.
>
> test/jdk/tools/jlink/JLink3500Packages.java line 35:
> 
>> 33: /*
>> 34:  * @test
>> 35:  * @summary Make sure that 4000 packages in a uber jar can be linked using jlink.
> 
> Should we mention that the number 3500 or 4000 is an arbitrary large number greater than `ModuleDescriptorBuilder.SET_SIZE_THRESHOLD` to trigger the provider method generation?

The bug reported 3300+, I was planning for 4000 but realized we can only do 3500+ so changed to that later due to the byte code we generated for each export.
The SET_SIZE_THRESHOLD is an arbitrary number. I will add a comment to mention that.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21022#discussion_r1776176190


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list