RFR: 8340812: LambdaForm customization via MethodHandle::updateForm is not thread safe

Tobias Hartmann thartmann at openjdk.org
Thu Sep 26 06:05:47 UTC 2024


On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 17:23:21 GMT, Abdelhak Zaaim <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> When investigating an intermittent NPE with an Oracle internal test on AArch64, I noticed that the NPE is actually a SIGSEGV in the code emitted by `MethodHandles::jump_to_lambda_form` when trying to load the `MemberName::method` field because the `MemberName` we retrieved from `LambdaForm::vmentry` is null:
>> 
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/f0374a0bc181d0f2a8c0aa9aa032b07998ffaf60/src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/methodHandles_aarch64.cpp#L141-L143
>> 
>> The JVM translates SIGSEGVs happening in method handle intrinsics to NPEs, assuming that they are implicit NPEs due to a null receiver:
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/f0374a0bc181d0f2a8c0aa9aa032b07998ffaf60/src/hotspot/share/runtime/sharedRuntime.cpp#L979-L982
>> 
>> After digging around in the MethodHandle implementation that I'm not too familiar with, I found this suspicious code in `MethodHandle::updateForm`:
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/36314a90c15e2ab2a9b32c2e471655c1b07d452c/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandle.java#L1881-L1883
>> 
>> The `Unsafe.fullFence` was added by [JDK-8059877](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8059877) and replaced a `// ISSUE: Should we have a memory fence here?` [comment](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/224c42ee4d4c3027d1f8f0d8b7ecf6646e9418c3#diff-5a4b2f817a4273eacf07f3ee24782c58c8ff474c6d790f72298e906837c5543aL1442). If the intention was to [prevent publishing a partially initialized object](https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/java/TSM03-J.+Do+not+publish+partially+initialized+objects), I think it was added to the wrong place (paging @iwanowww).
>> 
>> In the failing scenario, we concurrently trigger LambdaForm customization for a VarHandle invoker:
>> 
>> 	at java.base/java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle.updateForm(MethodHandle.java:1883)
>> 	at java.base/java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle.customize(MethodHandle.java:1856)
>> 	at java.base/java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle.maybeCustomize(MethodHandle.java:1846)
>> 	at java.base/java.lang.invoke.Invokers.maybeCustomize(Invokers.java:632)
>> 	at java.base/java.lang.invoke.Invokers.checkCustomized(Invokers.java:626)
>> 
>> The problem is that another thread can observe `newForm` which via the `MethodHandle::form` field before the store to `vmentry` in `prepare()` (see [here](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/36314a90c15e2ab2a9b32c2e471655c1b07d452c/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/LambdaForm.java#L821)) is visible and therefore observe null. We need a StoreStore barrier to prevent store...
>
> Marked as reviewed by abdelhak-zaaim at github.com (no known OpenJDK username).

Thanks for the review @abdelhak-zaaim !

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21160#issuecomment-2376009408


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list