RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v27]
Maurizio Cimadamore
mcimadamore at openjdk.org
Thu Apr 3 12:22:03 UTC 2025
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 12:14:52 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore <mcimadamore at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> That was intentional as the list is always `0..size` whereas a map can use arbitrary inputs. Is there a better way to illustrate this than what we have now?
>
> I guess my "beef" is that the examples for int function and function are similar -- they use same class name. Reader might expect (as I did) that they do the same thing, just using a different backing storage. But they don't -- not only is the implementation tweaked to use function instead of int function -- also what is cached changes subtly. I'm afraid this will be difficult to follow for readers. If you want to highlight that the "function" example has more freedom, I think we'd be better off with using another example. For instance:
>
> * use square(int)->int to show off int function/list
> * use square_root(int)->int to show off function/map
(e.g. stable int function is good for _total functions_ -- stable function is good for _partial functions_)
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23972#discussion_r2026878559
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list