RFR: 8347471: Provide valid flags and mask in AccessFlag.Location [v8]

Chen Liang liach at openjdk.org
Mon Apr 28 20:08:52 UTC 2025


On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:56:23 GMT, Roger Riggs <rriggs at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Fix iterator missing NSEE
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/AccessFlag.java line 634:
> 
>> 632:          * <p>
>> 633:          * This method may return {@code 0} if the structure does not exist in
>> 634:          * the given {@code cffv}.
> 
> Suggestion:
> 
>          * {@return the union of masks of all access flags defined for
>          * this location in the given class file format version}
>          * <p>
>          * This method returns {@code 0} if there are no access flags in
>          * the given {@code cffv}.
> 
> The word structure seems out of place and indefinite.

I meant "if this location is not present in the given `cffv`" and don't think "no access flags" is the best way to phrase it - consider MODULE location for Java 8.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23095#discussion_r2064460386


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list