RFR: 8365203: defineClass with direct buffer can cause use-after-free
Per Minborg
pminborg at openjdk.org
Mon Aug 11 12:41:27 UTC 2025
On Mon, 11 Aug 2025 11:33:19 GMT, Per Minborg <pminborg at openjdk.org> wrote:
> ### Description
> This PR proposes to update the `ClassLoader` implementation to properly guard access to the provided `ByteBuffer` when defining a class using `defineClass(String, ByteBuffer, ...)`. Specifically, calls to `SharedSecrets.getJavaNioAccess().acquireSession(ByteBuffer)` and `releaseSession(ByteBuffer)` have been introduced to ensure safe and consistent buffer access throughout the native class definition process, even in the case of a `ByteBuffer` is backed by a `MemorySegment`.
>
> ### Impact
> This modification is internal to the `ClassLoader` implementation and does not affect the public API.
> Improves the robustness and security of class loading from buffers.
>
> ### Testing
> Tier 1, 2, and 3 JDK tests pass on multiple platforms.
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/ClassLoader.java line 1054:
> 1052: String source = defineClassSourceLocation(protectionDomain);
> 1053:
> 1054: SharedSecrets.getJavaNioAccess().acquireSession(b);
Now that the fields in `SharedSecrets` are `@Stable`, we do not have to make a local copy in a `static final` field.
test/jdk/java/lang/ClassLoader/defineClass/GuardByteBuffer.java line 43:
> 41:
> 42: @Test
> 43: void guardCrash() throws InterruptedException {
I was not able to reproduce the crash using this test on a Mac. The original reproducer worked on a Windows machine.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26724#discussion_r2266596901
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26724#discussion_r2266592416
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list