RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement close and be AutoCloseable [v4]

[Volkan Yazici]

On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:50:33 GMT, Roger Riggs <rriggs at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The teardown of a Process launched by `ProcessBuilder` includes the closing of streams and ensuring the termination of the process is the responsibility of the caller. The `Process.close()` method provides a clear and obvious way to ensure all the streams are closed and the process terminated.
>> 
>> The try-with-resources statement is frequently used to open streams and ensure they are closed on exiting the block. By implementing `AutoClosable.close()` the completeness of closing the streams and process termination can be done by try-with-resources.
>> 
>> The actions of the `close()` method are to close each stream and destroy the process if it has not terminated.
>
> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Revisited handling of IOExceptions to throw instead of completely ignoring or logging.

src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Process.java line 146:

> 144:  * @since   1.0
> 145:  */
> 146: public abstract class Process implements AutoCloseable {

Since we added `throws IOException` to `close()`, have we considered implementing `Closeable` instead?

src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Process.java line 651:

> 649:      * @since 26
> 650:      */
> 651:     public void close() throws IOException {

Suggestion:

    @Override
    public void close() throws IOException {

test/jdk/java/lang/Process/ProcessCloseTest.java line 386:

> 384:                     break;
> 385:                 } catch (InterruptedException ie) {
> 386:                     // retry above

Are we sure about completely discarding the interrupt?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26649#discussion_r2287302548
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26649#discussion_r2287295760
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26649#discussion_r2287315234