RFR: 4517644: Core reflection setter type conversion spec bugs [v3]
Chen Liang
liach at openjdk.org
Sat Dec 6 00:03:13 UTC 2025
On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 20:43:37 GMT, Chen Liang <liach at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> ### Current Status
>> In core reflection, there are a few holes with the documentation on the type conversions performed on the different setters. They generally follow this process:
>>
>> 1. The Object-valued setters checks the destination type. If that type is primitive, unbox the object.
>> 2. Perform identity or (primitive/reference, depending on destination type) widening conversions.
>>
>> For each step, they can fail with IllegalArgumentException, which has been the long standing behavior.
>>
>> Note that this process is more restrictive than the JLS 5.2 assignment context, which allows boxing conversions, while the primitive reflective setters consistently reject them.
>>
>> ### Problems
>> There are some problems with current specs:
>> 1. No mention that boxing is never done for primitive-typed setters
>> 2. Array.set missing description for the final identity or widening conversion (reference or primitive) and the associated IAE condition
>> 3. Class specification of field mentions widening/narrowing conversion rules that is not sensible for get/set Object accessors
>> 4. Field.set misses the identity or widening in IAE clause (but mentioned in main body)
>> 5. Field primitive setters incorrectly claim they are equivalent to set(instance, wrapper) which is wrong due to lack of boxing conversion
>> 6. Field primitive setters refer to nonsense "unwrapping conversion"
>>
>> ### Solutions
>> 1. Make sure the unbox -> identity/widen process and the IAE conditions are present in both Field and Array.set
>> 2. Add that boxing is absent for all primitive setters
>> 3. Update Field class spec to mention the narrowing/widening conversion limits are for primitive accessors only
>> 4. Fix the Field primitive setters' "unwrapping conversion" to be "identity or primitive widening conversion" as in Array primitive setters
>> 5. Qualify the Field primitive setters assertion with "if this field is of a primitive type" to make it correct
>
> Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains seven additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - Link
> - Update
> - Redundant
> - Stuff for the class spec
> - Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk into doc/reflect-set
> - the narrowing conversion restriction is primitive-only
> - 4517644: (reflect spec) Array.set documentation hole for array/value ref type mismatch
Abandoned in favor of #28685.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28029#issuecomment-3618993321
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list