RFR: 8372978: [VectorAPI] Fix incorrect identity values in UMIN/UMAX reductions [v3]
Eric Fang
erfang at openjdk.org
Fri Dec 19 09:55:31 UTC 2025
On Tue, 16 Dec 2025 17:26:57 GMT, Paul Sandoz <psandoz at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Eric Fang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains four commits:
>>
>> - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8372978-fix-umin-umax-identity
>> - Declare two constants for UMIN/UMAX reduction identity values
>> - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8372978-fix-umin-umax-identity
>> - 8372978: [VectorAPI] Fix incorrect identity values in UMIN/UMAX reductions
>>
>> The original implementation of UMIN/UMAX reductions in JDK-8346174
>> used incorrect identity values in the Java implementation and test code.
>>
>> Problem:
>> --------
>> UMIN was using MAX_OR_INF (signed maximum value) as the identity:
>> - Byte.MAX_VALUE (127) instead of max unsigned byte (255)
>> - Short.MAX_VALUE (32767) instead of max unsigned short (65535)
>> - Integer.MAX_VALUE instead of max unsigned int (-1)
>> - Long.MAX_VALUE instead of max unsigned long (-1)
>>
>> UMAX was using MIN_OR_INF (signed minimum value) as the identity:
>> - Byte.MIN_VALUE (-128) instead of 0
>> - Short.MIN_VALUE (-32768) instead of 0
>> - Integer.MIN_VALUE instead of 0
>> - Long.MIN_VALUE instead of 0
>>
>> This caused incorrect result. For example:
>> UMAX([42,42,...,42]) returned 128 instead of 42
>>
>> Solution:
>> ---------
>> Use correct unsigned identity values:
>> - UMIN: ($type$)-1 (maximum unsigned value)
>> - UMAX: ($type$)0 (minimum unsigned value)
>>
>> Changes:
>> --------
>> - X-Vector.java.template: Fixed identity values in reductionOperations
>> - gen-template.sh: Fixed identity values for test code generation
>> - templates/Unit-header.template: Updated copyright year to 2025
>> - Regenerated all Vector classes and test files
>>
>> Testing:
>> --------
>> All types (byte/short/int/long) now return correct results in both
>> interpreter mode (-Xint) and compiled mode.
>
> test/jdk/jdk/incubator/vector/templates/Kernel-Reduction-Masked-op-func.template line 12:
>
>> 10: $abstractvectortype$ av = $abstractvectortype$.fromArray(SPECIES, a, i);
>> 11: r[i] = av.reduceLanes(VectorOperators.[[TEST]], vmask);
>> 12: ra = [[TEST_OP]](ra, r[i]);
>
> It's probably ok to merge the two cases, but to be conservative assign to a local variable rather than reading from the array e.g.,
>
> $type$ v = av.reduceLanes(VectorOperators.[[TEST]], vmask);
> r[i] = v;
> ra = [[TEST_OP]](ra, v);
Hi @PaulSandoz . I've changed to using a temporary variable.
By the way, are you worried that the `read-after-write` optimization isn't implemented in some architectures?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28692#discussion_r2634426258
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list