adding Xalan's XSL 3 implementation within jdk

[Markus KARG]

As long as Xalan is contained in OpenJDK, it should be updated. It makes 
no sense to provide XSL 1 still, but not XSL 2 or 3.

A different question is whether that means that the source code must be 
copied into OpenJDK, or if it wouldn't be enough to instead bundle the 
original JAR from Apache, or to drop bundling of Xalan at all, asking 
people to download it manually.

-Markus Karg


Am 26.02.2025 um 16:59 schrieb Mukul Gandhi:
> Hi Alan,
>      I've just seen this mail from you. Apologies for a delayed response.
>
> My mail box has had few issues due to the volume of mails that I get
> from mailing lists.
>
> On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 9:38 PM Alan Bateman <alan.bateman at oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> The stats for that branch suggest 5,845 changed files with 234,372 additions and 84,058 deletions. I can't easily tell how much of this would need to come into the jdk repo but this looks like a major update. If only 10% of this is applicable to the JDK then it still needs seems like a major update that would require a huge investment to audit and integrate this code. How much XML is in new applications developed in 2025? Only asking because it's an area that is surely much lower priority compared to all the other major investments right now. Maybe there are useful security or performance changes that would be useful to cherry pick instead? Finally, does this Xalan update work with the SPIs so that someone really looking for XSL 3 can just deploy it on the class path and module path?
> Ofcourse, anyone could use Xalan-J's XSL 3 implementation with JDK by
> placing Xalan jars on class path & module path.
>
> Since Xalan-J's XSLT 1.0 & XPath 1.0 implementations are already
> available within JDK, I thought its natural if JDK could pick
> Xalan-J's XSL 3 implementation and include that within JDK. I can
> imagine that this may surely be time consuming for someone from JDK
> team to integrate with JDK. XSLT 1.0's use I think is very less these
> days particularly for new XML projects, due to vast improvements in
> language features offered by XSLT 3.0 and XPath 3.1.
>
> IMHO, I wrote all the XSL 3 implementation code (and solved various
> XSL 3 implementation bugs reported by community on Xalan-J's dev
> forum) within Xalan-J's XSL 3 dev respos branch, enhancing upon
> Xalan-J's XSLT 1.0 implementation. From my point of view, I'll be
> happy if JDK could include Xalan-J's XSL 3 implementation.
>
> I even wrote following two online articles on xml.com about few of XSL
> 3 language features, and how they're implemented within Xalan-J,
> https://www.xml.com/articles/2024/07/22/string-analysis-with-analyze-string/
> https://www.xml.com/articles/2023/12/05/xml-path-language-xpath-higher-order-functions/
>
>
> Many thanks.
>
>