RFR: 8287788: Implement a better allocator for downcalls. [v13]
Jorn Vernee
jvernee at openjdk.org
Wed Jan 22 16:55:51 UTC 2025
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 15:01:03 GMT, Matthias Ernst <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Certain signatures for foreign function calls (e.g. HVA return by value) require allocation of an intermediate buffer to adapt the FFM's to the native stub's calling convention. In the current implementation, this buffer is malloced and freed on every FFM invocation, a non-negligible overhead.
>>
>> Sample stack trace:
>>
>> java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
>> at jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.allocateMemory0(java.base at 25-ea/Native Method)
>> ...
>> at jdk.internal.foreign.abi.SharedUtils.newBoundedArena(java.base at 25-ea/SharedUtils.java:386)
>> at jdk.internal.foreign.abi.DowncallStub/0x000001f001084c00.invoke(java.base at 25-ea/Unknown Source)
>> ...
>> at java.lang.invoke.Invokers$Holder.invokeExact_MT(java.base at 25-ea/Invokers$Holder)
>>
>>
>> To alleviate this, this PR implements a per carrier-thread stacked allocator.
>>
>> Performance (MBA M3):
>>
>>
>> Before:
>> Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
>> CallOverheadByValue.byPtr avgt 10 3.333 ? 0.152 ns/op
>> CallOverheadByValue.byValue avgt 10 33.892 ? 0.034 ns/op
>>
>> After:
>> Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
>> CallOverheadByValue.byPtr avgt 30 3.311 ? 0.034 ns/op
>> CallOverheadByValue.byValue avgt 30 6.143 ? 0.053 ns/op
>>
>>
>> `-prof gc` also shows that the new call path is fully scalar-replaced vs 160 byte/call before.
>
> Matthias Ernst has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> an attempt at a stress test
I've removed the trailing `.` from the issue title, so you should be able to fix the warning now. I don't mind changing the title/description to something else as well
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23142#issuecomment-2607765961
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list