RFR: 8361300: Document exceptions for Unsafe offset methods
ExE Boss
duke at openjdk.org
Wed Jul 2 19:26:18 UTC 2025
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 00:04:54 GMT, Chen Liang <liach at openjdk.org> wrote:
> Unsafe throws IAE for misusing static vs instance fields, and it's revealed that AtomicXxxFieldUpdaters are using this mechanism to reject static fields. This is not a good practice, but we can at least document this so we don't accidentally introduce problems.
I noticed that the native implementation of `Unsafe::array(BaseOffset/IndexScale)` refers to the non‑existent class `java.lang.InvalidClassException` instead of `java.lang.IllegalArgumentException` (which results in `java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError` being thrown):
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/1ca008fd02496dc33e2707c102560cae1690fba5/src/hotspot/share/prims/unsafe.cpp#L587-L594
src/hotspot/share/prims/unsafe.cpp line 498:
> 496: if (fs.access_flags().is_static()) {
> 497: offset = -1;
> 498: } else {
Since `offset` is initialised to `-1`, this can simply do:
Suggestion:
if (!fs.access_flags().is_static()) {
src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/misc/Unsafe.java line 1070:
> 1068: *
> 1069: * @throws NullPointerException if the field is {@code null}
> 1070: * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the field is static
Maybe these checks could be done in **Java** like:
// implicit null check:
if ((f.getModifiers() & ACC_STATIC) != 0) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Field is static");
}
and for the `staticField(Offset/Base)` methods:
// implicit null check:
if ((f.getModifiers() & ACC_STATIC) == 0) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Field is not static");
}
src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/misc/Unsafe.java line 1092:
> 1090: * in class {@code c}, i.e., if {@code c.getDeclaredField(name)}
> 1091: * would throw {@code java.lang.NoSuchFieldException}, or if such
> 1092: * a field is static
This is actually not the case, the native code only checks whether the field exists, not whether it’s also not `static`:
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/cbcf401170e0600e48ef74770eaa47c84c7e50b0/src/hotspot/share/prims/unsafe.cpp#L492-L503
Suggestion:
* would throw {@code java.lang.NoSuchFieldException}.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25945#issuecomment-3007131955
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25945#discussion_r2164661450
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25945#discussion_r2164571411
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25945#discussion_r2164571852
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list