RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v2]

Aleksey Shipilev shade at openjdk.org
Fri Jul 11 16:32:40 UTC 2025


On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 14:27:21 GMT, Chen Liang <liach at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> On 32 bit platforms, when an access to long/double is aligned, it is supported but not atomic. The original wording in `MethodHandles::byteBufferViewVarHandle` sounds as if it is not supported at all. We can fix that by borrowing the improved specification from `MemoryLayout::varHandle`.
>> 
>> Note: This doc is copied from https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/ee0d309bbd33302d8c6f35155e975db77aaea785/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/foreign/MemoryLayout.java#L279-L282 with slight adjustments. See the rendering at https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/24/docs/api/java.base/java/lang/foreign/MemoryLayout.html#access-mode-restrictions
>
> Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Correct term is atomic, not word tearing

I think it looks okay. But I am not spec expert, you need someone else to look at this carefully.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by shade (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26258#pullrequestreview-3011038416


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list