RFR: 8329077: C2 SuperWord: Add MoveD2L, MoveL2D, MoveF2I, MoveI2F
Emanuel Peter
epeter at openjdk.org
Thu Jul 31 12:53:00 UTC 2025
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 12:49:16 GMT, Emanuel Peter <epeter at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I've added support to vectorize `MoveD2L`, `MoveL2D`, `MoveF2I` and `MoveI2F` nodes. The implementation follows a similar pattern to what is done with conversion (`Conv*`) nodes. The tests in `TestCompatibleUseDefTypeSize` have been updated with the new expectations.
>>
>> Also added a JMH benchmark which measures throughput (the higher the number the better) for methods that exercise these nodes. On darwin/aarch64 it shows:
>>
>>
>> Benchmark (seed) (size) Mode Cnt Base Patch Units Diff
>> VectorBitConversion.doubleToLongBits 0 2048 thrpt 8 1168.782 1157.717 ops/ms -1%
>> VectorBitConversion.doubleToRawLongBits 0 2048 thrpt 8 3999.387 7353.936 ops/ms +83%
>> VectorBitConversion.floatToIntBits 0 2048 thrpt 8 1200.338 1188.206 ops/ms -1%
>> VectorBitConversion.floatToRawIntBits 0 2048 thrpt 8 4058.248 14792.474 ops/ms +264%
>> VectorBitConversion.intBitsToFloat 0 2048 thrpt 8 3050.313 14984.246 ops/ms +391%
>> VectorBitConversion.longBitsToDouble 0 2048 thrpt 8 3022.691 7379.360 ops/ms +144%
>>
>>
>> The improvements observed are a result of vectorization. The lack of vectorization in `doubleToLongBits` and `floatToIntBits` demonstrates that these changes do not affect their performance. These methods do not vectorize because of flow control.
>>
>> I've run the tier1-3 tests on linux/aarch64 and didn't observe any regressions.
>
> test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/java/lang/VectorBitConversion.java line 1:
>
>> 1: package org.openjdk.bench.java.lang;
>
> I think this benchmark belongs with the other vectorization benchmarks under
> `test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/vm/compiler/Vector*`
It's not really a language feature, more for vm/compiler
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26457#discussion_r2245296534
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list