RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements

Viktor Klang vklang at openjdk.org
Thu Jun 19 10:06:55 UTC 2025


On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 18:25:39 GMT, Pavel Rappo <prappo at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.java line 143:
> 
>> 141:  * that take too long. The scheduled functions or actions may create
>> 142:  * and invoke other {@linkplain ForkJoinTask ForkJoinTasks}. Delayed
>> 143:  * actions become <em>enabled</em> for execution and behave as ordinary submitted
> 
> Does it make sense to retain `<em>`?

Might make sense to remove it if we always spell it out at "enabled for execution"

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25880#discussion_r2156618787


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list