RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8]

[Pavel Rappo]

On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 10:51:35 GMT, Doug Lea <dl at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> @pavelrappo Indeed, "Reactive Streams" would be better. Perhaps something like this:
>> 
>> Suggestion:
>> 
>>  * fully conform to the Reactive Streams specification.
>
> Thanks; done.

Nit of a nit: would it make sense to also change "reactive-streams" to "Reactive Streams" earlier in that same file:

    * <p>These interfaces correspond to the <a
    * href="http://www.reactive-streams.org/"> reactive-streams</a>
    * specification.

"reactive-streams" is the domain, the maven artifact, and the repo name. It's not the specification or project name, which are "Reactive Streams".

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25880#discussion_r2158976689