RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v14]

[Joe Darcy]

On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 07:14:45 GMT, Alan Bateman <alanb at openjdk.org> wrote:

> > Note that test j/u/c/tck/ testTimeUnit already includes testTimedWait_IllegalMonitorException(). because it was already implied by the spec. The change just makes this explicit. Does this require CSR? (If so, I'd be happy to do it).
> 
> I don't think it's strictly needed here, Joe Darcy is going to give an opinion today.

Okay -- I've taken a quick look over the proposed changes. While most of the changes are clearly informative (and thus don't need a CSR), I think some of them would fall over the line of what needs a CSR (some changes in TimeUnit.java, RunnableFuture.java, Flow.java). Further work might show those other changes and already implied by other parts of the spec, but I think it is less effort overall just to run a quick CSR for this change. Thanks.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25880#issuecomment-2997849940