RFR: 8351372: Improve negative tests coverage of jpackage
Alexander Matveev
almatvee at openjdk.org
Sat Mar 8 04:31:04 UTC 2025
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:30:09 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk <asemenyuk at openjdk.org> wrote:
> Changes to tests:
> - Added more test cases to ErrorTest.
> - Added functionality to jpackage test lib to facilitate new ErrorTest test cases.
> - Make all other negative tests use the `CannedFormattedString` class to validate error messages in jpackage output strictly.
> - Removed redundant negative tests/test cases duplicating ErrorTest.
> - Give unique descriptions to macos signing tests.
>
> Changes to jpackage:
> - Main.java: Catch `java.nio.file.NoSuchFileException` as `jdk.internal.opt.CommandLine.parse()` throws this exception instead of `java.io.FileNotFoundException` to indicate missing command file. The issue was uncovered with the new ErrorTest test case for `ERR_CannotParseOptions` error ID.
> - DeployParams.java: replace `ERR_MissingArgument` with `error.no-input-parameter` as the error is not missing argument of `--input` parameter, but missing `--input` parameter itself. The issue was uncovered with the new ErrorTest test cases for `ERR_MissingArgument` and ``error.no-input-parameter` error IDs.
> - LauncherData.java: remove dead code as missing `--input` parameter is handled earlier in DeployParams.
> - DottedVersion.java: fix exception messages based on the new test cases in ErrorTest.
> - TokenRepalce.java/TokenRepalceTest.java: picked from https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23923 PR. It is needed for ErrorTest as well.
Looks good with minor comments.
test/jdk/tools/jpackage/macosx/base/SigningBase.java line 37:
> 35: enum CertIndex {
> 36: ASCII_INDEX(0),
> 37: UNICODE_INDEX(0),
This one should be 1. Looks like we had a bug.
test/jdk/tools/jpackage/share/ErrorTest.java line 333:
> 331: testSpec().addArgs("--type", "invalid-type")
> 332: .error("ERR_InvalidInstallerType", "invalid-type"),
> 333: // no --input for non-mular app
`non-mular` -> `non-modular`
-------------
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23936#pullrequestreview-2668889041
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23936#discussion_r1985970911
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23936#discussion_r1985973850
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list