RFR: 8351933: Inaccurate masking of TC subfield decrement in ForkJoinPool

Dmitry Chuyko dchuyko at openjdk.org
Mon Mar 17 15:25:55 UTC 2025


On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 13:34:51 GMT, Dmitry Chuyko <dchuyko at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Please review a tiny fix in the ForkJoinPool. Since JDK 9 (JDK-8134852 [1]) in one case when TC subfield in ctl field is decremented, the applied masking (UMASK, upper bits) may not preserve neighbor RC subfield sometimes. In JDKs prior to 19 FJP may stop executing tasks, which requires a long running application restart [2]. Since 19 it is even harder to reproduce because of the separate parallelism field.
> 
> The fix is to replace 'UMASK & (c - TC_UNIT)'  with '(c & RC_MASK) | ((c - TC_UNIT)  & TC_MASK)' which preserves the RC part of the compareAndSetCtl() candidate argument. On 17u and 11u that repairs known tests and applications. This PR is for the mainline, and I intend to backport it to 21u, 17u and 11u.
> 
> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8134852
> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8330017

So I'd propose to consider RC masking separately, and maybe as a part of larger FJP update (such as JDK-8319447), without a need to backport.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24034#issuecomment-2729937960


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list