RFR: 8352533: Report useful IOExceptions when jspawnhelper fails
Volker Simonis
simonis at openjdk.org
Wed Mar 26 00:02:12 UTC 2025
On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 10:00:26 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:
> When jspawnhelper fails for whatever reason, but more prominently due to [JDK-8325621](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8325621), it will report the errors into stdout, but not to the relevant `IOException`. So, if the application is configured to only capture the exception logs (e.g. through `java.util.logging`), we will miss any output from `jspawnhelper`, and user would be left without a clue what have happened. We have seen customers spending weeks trying to figure out what went wrong.
>
> It would be good to provide useful `IOException` when `jspawnhelper` fails. We already have a precedent with vmError [printing helpful suggestions](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/hotspot/share/utilities/vmError.cpp#L422) when VM fails, we can do a similar thing here.
>
> I am very open to bike-shedding about the actual message :)
>
> Additional testing:
> - [x] Ad-hoc experiments with breaking jspawnhelper
> - [x] macos-aarch64-server-fastdebug, `java/lang/Process java/lang/ProcessBuilder`
src/java.base/unix/native/libjava/ProcessImpl_md.c line 806:
> 804: case sizeof(errnum):
> 805: waitpid(resultPid, NULL, 0);
> 806: throwIOException(env, errnum, "Exec failed");
Why do we need to keep `throwIOException()` for this single call site? Can't we replace it with `throwInternalIOException()` as well?
Otherwise looks good.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24149#discussion_r2013088430
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list