RFR: 8352184: Jtreg tests using CommandLineOptionTest.getVMTypeOption() and optionsvalidation.JVMOptionsUtils fail on static JDK [v4]

Jiangli Zhou jiangli at openjdk.org
Thu Mar 27 14:42:20 UTC 2025


On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 19:28:24 GMT, Jiangli Zhou <jiangli at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Please review following changes, thanks.
>> 
>> - Add `static` to the vm_info for static JDK. The `-version` output now contains `static` on static JDK, e.g.:
>> 
>> 
>> $ static-jdk/bin/java -version
>> openjdk version "25-internal" 2025-09-16
>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (fastdebug build 25-internal-adhoc.jianglizhou.jdk)
>> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (fastdebug build 25-internal-adhoc.jianglizhou.jdk, mixed mode, static, sharing)
>> 
>> $ jdk/bin/java -version
>> openjdk version "25-internal" 2025-09-16
>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (fastdebug build 25-internal-adhoc.jianglizhou.jdk)
>> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (fastdebug build 25-internal-adhoc.jianglizhou.jdk, mixed mode, sharing)
>> 
>> 
>> Following changes resolve jtreg test failures on static JDK due to '-server|-client|-minimal|-zero' flag added by `CommandLineOptionTest.getVMTypeOption()` or `optionsvalidation.JVMOptionsUtils`. '-server|-client|-minimal|-zero' flags are unrecognized on static JDK (please see https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8350982).
>> 
>> - Add `jdk.test.lib.Platform.isStatic()`, which checks for `static` in `java.vm.info` system property to determine if current test is running on static JDK. 
>> - Change `CommandLineOptionTest` to only call `getVMTypeOption()` on regular JDK (`!Platform.isStatic()`).
>> - Change `optionsvalidation.JVMOptionsUtils` to only set VMType to '-server|-client|-minimal' on regular JDK ( `!Platform.isStatic()`.
>
> Jiangli Zhou has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Address @shipilev comments:
>   - In JVMOptionsUtils.<clinit>, make `if (Platform.isStatic())` block as a preceding block of other checks.
>   - In Abstract_VM_Version::vm_info_string(), break lines.

Thank you, both!

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24171#issuecomment-2758314709


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list