RFR: 8351443: Improve robustness of StringBuilder [v5]

Jaikiran Pai jpai at openjdk.org
Mon May 5 17:37:47 UTC 2025


On Mon, 5 May 2025 17:32:19 GMT, Roger Riggs <rriggs at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Refactor AbstractStringBuilder to maintain consistency among count, coder, and value buffers while the buffer capacity is being expanded and/or inflated from Latin1 to UTF16 representations. 
>> The refactoring pattern is to read and write AbstractStringBuilder fields once using locals for all intermediate values. 
>> Support methods are static, designed to pass all values as arguments and return a value.
>> 
>> The value byte array is reallocated under 3 conditions:
>> - Increasing the capacity with the same encoder
>> - Increasing the capacity and inflation to change the coder from LATIN1 to UTF16
>> - Inflation with the same capacity
>> 
>> Added StressSBTest to exercise public instance methods of StringBuilder.
>
> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Refactor to consistently use `isLatin1(coder)` within AbstractStringBuilder.

src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/StringUTF16.java line 1531:

> 1529:     }
> 1530: 
> 1531:     public static void putCharsAt(byte[] value, int i, char c1, char c2, char c3, char c4) {

Hello Roger, can this (pre-existing) method and the other `putCharsAt` that we are changing here, be changed to package private instead of `public`? As far as I can see, these 2 are only accessed from `java.lang.AbstractStringBuilder` which resides in the same package as this class.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24967#discussion_r2073878460


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list