RFR: 8351443: Improve robustness of StringBuilder [v6]
Brent Christian
bchristi at openjdk.org
Tue May 6 23:00:16 UTC 2025
On Tue, 6 May 2025 15:23:39 GMT, Roger Riggs <rriggs at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Refactor AbstractStringBuilder to maintain consistency among count, coder, and value buffers while the buffer capacity is being expanded and/or inflated from Latin1 to UTF16 representations.
>> The refactoring pattern is to read and write AbstractStringBuilder fields once using locals for all intermediate values.
>> Support methods are static, designed to pass all values as arguments and return a value.
>>
>> The value byte array is reallocated under 3 conditions:
>> - Increasing the capacity with the same encoder
>> - Increasing the capacity and inflation to change the coder from LATIN1 to UTF16
>> - Inflation with the same capacity
>>
>> Added StressSBTest to exercise public instance methods of StringBuilder.
>
> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Apply reviewer suggestions for typos, javadoc, and copyright dates.
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/AbstractStringBuilder.java line 2044:
> 2042: * @param s a string
> 2043: * @param off the offset of the first character to append
> 2044: * @param end end last (exclusive) character to append
It might be helpful to somehow clarify that, in the case of appending Latin1 characters to a Latin1 buffer, it is expected/required that `value` is already of sufficient size.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24967#discussion_r2076475596
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list