RFR: 8356486: ReverseOrderListView::reversed should return `base`
Chen Liang
liach at openjdk.org
Thu May 8 14:46:55 UTC 2025
On Thu, 8 May 2025 14:30:28 GMT, Per Minborg <pminborg at openjdk.org> wrote:
> This PR proposed to let `ReverseOrderListView::reversed` return `base` so that nested reversed views are avoided.
test/jdk/java/util/Collection/MOAT.java line 507:
> 505: private static <T> void testImmutableSeqColl(final SequencedCollection<T> c, T t) {
> 506: SequencedCollection<T> r = c.reversed();
> 507: if (r instanceof List<T> list && list.reversed() != c) {
Shouldn't all double-reverse be identity? Why is this restricted to lists?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25120#discussion_r2079865444
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list