RFR: 8371637: allocateNativeInternal sometimes return incorrectly aligned memory [v6]

[Harald Eilertsen]

On Wed, 19 Nov 2025 13:29:28 GMT, Harald Eilertsen <haraldei at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> `jdk.internal.foreign.SegmentFactories::allocateNativeInternal` assumes that the underlying implementation of malloc aligns allocations on 16 byte boundaries for 64 bit platforms, and 8 byte boundaries on 32 bit platforms. So for any allocation where the requested alignment is less than or equal to this default alignment it makes no adjustment.
>> 
>> However, this assumption does not hold for all allocators. Specifically jemallc, used by libc on FreeBSD will align small allocations on 8 or 4 byte boundaries, respectively. This causes allocateNativeInternal to sometimes return memory that is not properly aligned when the requested alignment is exactly 16 bytes.
>> 
>> To make sure we honour the requested alignment when it exaclty matches the quantum as defined by MAX_MALLOC_ALIGN, this patch ensures that we adjust the alignment also in this case.
>> 
>> This should make no difference for platforms where malloc allready aligns on the quantum, except for a few unnecessary trivial calculations.
>> 
>> This work was sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
>
> Harald Eilertsen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Replace conditional with Math.max intrinsic
>   
>   Co-authored-by: ExE Boss <3889017+ExE-Boss at users.noreply.github.com>

I like that the openjdk bot is open to persuasion :)

Should I also add [the test](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/28235#issuecomment-3532821794) suggested by @Yqwed before we conclude this PR, or is it better to leave it for a later one?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28235#issuecomment-3557197285