RFR: 8371571: Consolidate and enhance bulk memory segment ops benchmarks [v5]
Per Minborg
pminborg at openjdk.org
Tue Nov 25 12:26:32 UTC 2025
On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 12:22:29 GMT, Per Minborg <pminborg at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This PR proposes to consolidate and standardize the benchmarks related to the bulk operations for memory segments.
>>
>> All the benchmarks will now run with (heap|native)x(aligned|unaligned)x(intint|intlong|longlong) combinations.
>>
>> It should be noted that with this change, the running time for the benchmarks would increase significantly.
>
> Per Minborg has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains nine additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - Update after comments
> - Merge branch 'master' into improved-bulk-benchmarks
> - Add loop variant for mismatch
> - Use other allocateFrom overload
> - Remove lingering comment
> - Refactor and use long arrays
> - Remove BulkOps
> - Fix copyright years
> - Improve BulkOp benchmarks
Benchmark (size) Mode Cnt Score Error Units
SegmentBulkCopy.Array.bufferCopy 2 avgt 30 3.028 ± 0.094 ns/op
SegmentBulkCopy.Array.bufferCopy 4 avgt 30 2.825 ± 0.047 ns/op
SegmentBulkCopy.Array.bufferCopy 8 avgt 30 2.694 ± 0.048 ns/op
SegmentBulkCopy.Array.bufferCopy 12 avgt 30 2.736 ± 0.019 ns/op
SegmentBulkCopy.Array.bufferCopy 16 avgt 30 2.705 ± 0.024 ns/op
SegmentBulkCopy.Array.bufferCopy 64 avgt 30 2.851 ± 0.017 ns/op
SegmentBulkCopy.Array.bufferCopy 512 avgt 30 7.329 ± 0.116 ns/op
SegmentBulkCopy.Array.bufferCopy 4096 avgt 30 51.591 ± 0.667 ns/op
SegmentBulkCopy.Array.bufferCopy 32768 avgt 30 626.952 ± 43.598 ns/op
SegmentBulkCopy.Array.bufferCopy 262144 avgt 30 3339.947 ± 16.218 ns/op
SegmentBulkCopy.Array.bufferCopy 2097152 avgt 30 26569.111 ± 1974.834 ns/op
SegmentBulkCopy.Array.bufferCopy 16777216 avgt 30 258056.303 ± 9005.471 ns/op
SegmentBulkCopy.Array.bufferCopy 134217728 avgt 30 2335005.220 ± 43871.900 ns/op
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28260#issuecomment-3575400339
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list